MTA Transit Cuts Challenged by Disabled New Yorkers

August 17, 2010, Brooklyn, NY: 
Today, plaintiffs RueZalia Watkins, Anthony Trocchia, and Clara Reiss,
all people who are unable to travel long distances on their own or make use of
the subway system because of their mobility impairments, along with Disabled In
Action of Metropolitan New York and The Brooklyn Center for the Independence of
the Disabled Inc., both non-profit agencies that advocate on behalf of disabled
New Yorkers, filed suit against the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) and
New York City Transit (NYCT). They are challenging cuts to the City's bus
system and its complementary paratransit system that leave them without public
transportation service comparable to that provided to non-disabled people, in
violation of their rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. 

(Click for coverage at WNYC (8/18), the New York Post (8/18), and the Brooklyn Eagle (8/17),  NewYorkSubwayNews.com (9/5) the Bay Ridge Journal (8/28) and TransportationAccess.com (8/21)) 

The plaintiffs are represented by South Brooklyn Legal Services (SBLS)
(a program of Legal Services NYC), the New York Legal Assistance Group (NYLAG)
and Emery, Celli, Brinckerhoff and
Abady.  Plaintiffs seek a permanent
injunction reversing the MTA and NYCT service cuts and restoring paratransit
services. 

The
lawsuit challenges city-wide service cuts implemented by the MTA and NYCT
beginning on June 27, 2010, cutting eighty-nine bus lines.  These service cuts have forced transit
passengers either to travel a greater distance to an alternate bus route or to
travel by subway rather than by bus.  For
Plaintiffs, however, both of these options are impossible, thus imposing a
greater hardship on people with disabilities than on people without
disabilities.  And they cannot rely on the
City's already overburdened paratransit system – Access-A-Ride – because rather
than ensuring that additional resources are devoted to Access-A-Ride in
anticipation of the increase in demand occasioned by the reduction in bus
service, the Defendants have instituted or approved significant cuts to the
system.  There are approximately 138,000
individuals approved for Access-A-Ride and disabled riders made 5.8 million trips
on Access-A-Ride in 2008; the June 27^th transit cuts are estimated
to eliminate 26,000 trips on Access-A-Ride each year.

The individual plaintiffs all are
mobility-impaired and travel either via wheelchair or with a walker.  Plaintiff RueZalia Watkins uses a manual
wheelchair and lives in Brooklyn. Prior to the
cuts, the buses were her main means of transportation and she routinely used
the B39 bus to travel from her home in Brooklyn to her work in Manhattan.  She utilizes Access-A-Ride, but deficiencies
with this service mean that she must miss work obligations, and work on the
weekend to make up for it.  Lamenting the
changes to her work schedule because of the service cuts, Ms. Watkins says that
the "MTA has effectively denied
disabled New Yorkers in the outer boroughs access to Manhattan."

Plaintiff Anthony Trocchia has Spinal
Muscular Atrophy Type 3, uses a motorized wheelchair, and is eligible for
Access-A-Ride.  Prior to the Defendants'
cuts to bus service, Mr. Trocchia relied on the bus system to travel from his
home in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, to Manhattan.  Gaps between platforms and subway cars make
it almost impossible for him to use the subway. 
And the subway lines identified as replacements for his lost bus (J, M,
Z), either do not have fully accessible stations in Manhattan, where he must go for doctors'
appointments and other meetings, or do not run on the weekend.  Advance booking required for Access-A-Ride
means that there is no possibility of spontaneity or flexibility to deal with
life's contingencies, such as a medical appointment being delayed.  Mr. Trocchia fears the impact of the service
cuts on disabled New Yorkers:  "Elimination of any bus route tells wheelchair users to
become shut-ins."  "Either they
didn't analyze the impact that these cuts were going to have on people with
disabilities or they just don't care," says
Plaintiff Clara Reiss, who lives in Manhattan.
 Ms.
Reiss uses a walker because of the after-effects of polio.  As the result of cuts to Access-A-Ride, Ms.
Reiss' eligibility has been made contingent on the weather, even though her
disability is not affected by the weather. 
 

The plaintiffs'
lawsuit asserts that the Defendants' actions violate both the Americans With
Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.  The ADA
mandates that public entities may not discriminate against people with
disabilities and may not deny them the benefits of services provided to people
without disabilities.  And the law makes
it clear that it is "discrimination" for a public entity which operates a fixed
route system to fail to provide paratransit services that are "comparable to
the level of designated public transportation services provided to individuals
without disabilities using such system." 
This includes response time, which also must be comparable, to the
extent practicable, to the level of designated public transportation services
provided to individuals without disabilities. 42 U.S.C. § 12143(a) (2).  Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
prohibits discrimination against a protected class by any program which
receives federal assistance.  Said Pavita Krishnaswamy of SBLS, "the service
cuts implemented by the MTA on June 27, 2010, are impermissibly depriving
mobility impaired New Yorkers of the opportunity to participate fully in the
rich economic, educational, recreational and cultural activities available to
the rest of New York."

"It
is unacceptable that special-needs riders, and others who depend solely on bus
lines to travel for work and to other boroughs, as well as individuals who ride
during overnight hours are now subjected to finding other means of
transportation, or not traveling at all.  Taking the bus is simply a
better option for the mobility-impaired because of the lack of elevators at
most MTA subway stops," said Council Member Letitia James, who supports the
suit. 

"The MTA provided absolutely no
accessible public transportation until people with mobility impairments sued
them in the early 1980s.  Two lawsuits ultimately resulted in the current
fully accessible bus service, the existence of the paratransit system, and limited
improvements in accessibility of the subway system.  It is a shame that it
now requires another lawsuit to maintain access to public transportation for
people with mobility impairments in this city," said Jane Greengold Stevens of
NYLAG, who was lead attorney on one of the two suits in the 80s. 

Jean Ryan, the Vice President for
Public Affairs for Disabled in Action, explains:  "The MTA bus cuts are devastating for
people with mobility disabilities. We are functioning members of society! 
Many of us cannot use the subways which are mostly inaccessible in the
outer boroughs and unreliable if there. To have to walk extra blocks or change
to multiple bus routes is too much for many people with disabilities. The MTA
took away our accessible means of getting to other boroughs and getting around
in our own boroughs. We are back to the old days of being stuck in our homes.
This impacts our ability to work, to seek medical care, to have fun, to do
volunteer work, and to see friends. Disabled In Action says bring back the
buses!"  Disabled In Action of
Metropolitan New York is a plaintiff in the case.

Mobility-impaired
people in Brooklyn who previously relied on the buses to get to Manhattan are particularly
affected by the cuts.  As stated by
Marvin Wasserman, the Executive Director of Brooklyn Center for the
Independence of the Disabled, which is a plaintiff in the suit:  "persons
with disabilities in Brooklyn have suffered a disproportionate share of MTA's
transit cuts, as far more bus routes were cut in Brooklyn than any other
borough. In particular, wheelchair users who have relied on bus service to Manhattan to go to jobs,
medical appointments, and
socialization have found their lives seriously
disrupted. The TLC's proposal to replace some of these routes with so-called
‘dollar-vans' does not assure wheelchair users that they will be able to use
them."

Marty
Markowitz, the Brooklyn Borough President, is similarly concerned:   "Some of these routes may not be the most
heavily used, but they are absolute lifelines for riders with disabilities or
who are elderly. There is simply no reasonable way for people with mobility and
accessibility issues who cannot take the subway-especially considering many
stations are not ADA-compliant-to get around with cuts to these vital bus
routes and Access-A-Ride."

And, emphasizes New York State
Assembly Member Joan L. Millman, the MTA's budget shortfall should not be
balanced on the backs of those least able to adjust to service cuts:  "Seniors, people with disabilities and students
who rely heavily on these buses are left with no feasible alternatives. 
Contrary to what the MTA says, subway service does not replicate bus
service.  Many stations are not accessible and, in many cases, stations
that are accessible have stairs which people with disabilities cannot
navigate.  During these difficult economic times, governments have to
learn how to operate more efficiently.  This goes for the MTA as well."

Plaintiffs
are seeking a declaration that the Defendants' failure to provide people with
disabilities with access to public transportation violates the ADA and Section 504 and a
permanent injunction directing the Defendants to restore bus service and
maintain Access-A-Ride service necessary to provide to people with mobility
impairments access to public transportation comparable to that provided to
non-disabled riders.

About South Brooklyn Legal Services

South Brooklyn Legal Services, a program of
Legal Services NYC, is dedicated to helping low-income residents of Southern
and Western Brooklyn with their civil legal
problems. It ensures equal access to justice for the people of Brooklyn by providing free counsel and legal advice to
those who would otherwise be unable to afford it.

About
New York Legal Assistance Group

The New York Legal
Assistance Group (NYLAG), founded in 1990, is a not-for-profit law office
providing free civil legal services to low-income New Yorkers. A full service
agency, NYLAG provides consultation, representation, and advocacy.  In 2009, NYLAG directly served more than
46,000 individuals and NYLAG's Special Litigation Unit (SLU) helped thousands
of additional clients through successful impact litigation.

About Disabled in Action of Metropolitan New York

Disabled In Action of Metropolitan New York (DIA) is a
membership organization that advocates for the civil rights of, and services
for, people with disabilities. DIA has been a plaintiff in previous civil
rights lawsuits on behalf of people with disabilities, including a lawsuit to
obtain ADA-compliant paratransit services for people with disabilities in New York City.

About Brooklyn
Center for the Independence
of the Disabled

Brooklyn Center for the Independence
of the Disabled, Inc. ("BCID") is a not-for-profit membership organization
located in Brooklyn, NY. 
The organization's mission is to empower people with disabilities by
improving the quality of their lives and fostering their integration into the
mainstream of society. BCID attempts to achieve these goals through provision
of services, as well as by advocating for the removal of physical, attitudinal,
and communication barriers for people with disabilities.